First, by working to reduce the impact on a business scale. Secondly, by investing in the improvement of the natural environment on which the tourist activity depends (and not just on its property, garden, or piece of beach). Thirdly, and very importantly, by using its strength and influence it must take giant steps in marine conservation instead of just dragging its feet.
The fact is that we are still a long way away from a tourism sector that is fully involved in the care and custody of the Balearic Sea. Although tourism benefits enormously from a sea and coastline in good condition, it has so far, on its own initiative, invested very little in their care and conservation; it has not put its full strength and influence into this cause.
Even so, we have seen signs of improvement on all three fronts. Most of the tourism sector is already working to reduce its impact, implementing measures to reduce water consumption, carbon emissions or waste generation, or to buy local. The ecological footprint is entering the balance sheet and will do so even more after the entry into force of the EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).
In recent years we have also started to see some remarkable actions by companies in the sector getting involved in marine conservation. Fundatur, the RIU Hotel Group, and the TUI Care Foundation have made significant financial contributions to the conservation of the Balearic Sea, the later with €500,000. Marilles Foundation redistributes these donations in their entirety to local projects and entities, with a greater probability of impact. Among many other activities, they have allowed us to advance plans to restore shallow bays, improve and extend marine protected areas. and co-produce with IB3 the unique series Arxipèlag Blau.
It is also worth highlighting the broad support that hotel companies and the tourism sector have given to the Balearic Blue Deal. It is to be celebrated that a little more than a year ago a large part of the tourism industry in the Balearic Islands came out publicly in favour of this initiative, calling for more political action and more funding for the protection of the Balearic Sea. We hope that this is the first of many steps that will give visibility to the tourism industry’s commitment to the marine conservation of these islands and their natural heritage.
But, as the Balearic Blue Deal itself recognises, we cannot talk about marine conservation and quality tourism without mentioning a key variable: quantity. We must talk about the volume of tourists visiting our islands and the growing demographic pressure.
If we do not work on quantity, we will not be able to have quality tourism or a well-conserved sea. This truism has been a source of controversy over the last few decades. Now, after the welcome, albeit surprising announcement by President Prohens acknowledging that the Balearics need to reduce the number of tourists, we seem to be entering a new context.
After years of hearing that we need to grow in value and not in volume, we hope that we can finally move from words to action. While we look for the best ways to reduce the population pressure on the Islands, now more than ever the tourism sector and the Balearic government need to reinforce and demonstrate their commitment to the protection and regeneration of the Balearic Sea.
1 comment
To be able to write a comment, you have to be registered and logged in
"After years of hearing that we need to grow in value and not in volume, we hope that we can finally move from words to action". Actually, that progress is blatantly visible throughout the landscape here. From Magaluf to Sa Pabla, from Porreres to Colonia Sant Pere, and all across the island. Quality infrastructure and accommodation is far more advanced than it was even 5 years ago. It's (quietly) been rather revolutionary, actually. But it's still just a baby. There's still a lot of growing up left to do. Obviously. This transition, however, is very uncomfortable for both (certain) locals and many tourists. We're now seeing the "volume" seekers (angrily) leaving for "greener pastures" such as Greece, which hosts the most saturated and overcrowded tourist areas in Europe (as if they care). So, ok, enjoy Greece. It's cheap and you can drink yourself into oblivion if you want, and nobody will care. The beds are crap, the food mediocre, the liquor cheap, but as long as there's a lot of it, you'll feel right at home. Back here, we increasingly have plenty of quality seekers now discovering all that's on the menu here. And they're happy to pay for it. Cheapness is quickly becoming so "yesterday". It seems many hadn't predicted how popular growing up would be. Now they're surprised. And overwhelmed. Also, it's worth considering that there's no place on the planet that has good infrastructure, beauty, top grade accommodation, easy accessibility, and the resulting popularity those things generate without eventually becoming expensive. So, you either find a way to deal with that, or go back to the 80's. And I suspect nobody really wants the latter (perhaps unwittingly?) So, shall we shoot for finding ways to better accommodate the local population in this transition? Or just go back to the 80's? That latter sure sounds easier, but it won't make it better.