Santa Catalina will be one of the Palma districts most affected by the terraces bylaw.

25-07-2014Miquel À. Cañellas

Revised ordinance in respect of the public way in Palma should finally come into force before the start of the main tourism season. One of its main aspects has to do with bar and restaurant terraces, and unless there are any further revisions to the draft bylaw, some parts of the city will lose a significant number of terraces.

Santa Catalina is set to be most affected. There are at present 123 terraces. The bylaw envisages the disappearance of 52 (42%), these being 25 full terraces and 27 what are referred to as "micro-occupancies" (one or two tables or barrels). In Pere Garau, the 68 terraces would be reduced by 25. Six would go from the fifteen in Es Jonquet, while 25 would be eliminated from the current 294 in the old centre of the city.

The reason for the terraces disappearing is because of a stipulation that there is a minimum of 2.5 metres space for pedestrians. This will also mean that the size of some terraces is reduced.

A further change is to appearance. Awnings will have to go, and there will be an eighteen-month period during which they will need to be removed. Parasols and screens, similar to those on the Born, will be all that is permitted.

In total, there are around 1,650 terraces in Palma, of which 500 will be affected by the "zoning" principle applied by the town hall. This zoning is intended to reduce "saturation" of the public way.

The process of arriving at this new bylaw has been fraught. There have been and still are disagreements between the parties governing the town hall, while the restaurants association walked out of negotiations because it felt its views were not being listened to. The federation of residents association has consistently had its say (generally wanting more restrictions), and the city's ombudsman has also become involved.

One element that is currently absent from the new ordinance is any study of the economic impact of the changes.

Meanwhile, bar and restaurant owners along the Paseo Mallorca are considering legal action against the town hall. One bar owner told the Bulletin that he had thought Podemos were on the side of small businesses.

"I've been to the town hall, but they were no help. My awning was put up by the previous bar owner, so I'm not taking it down, the town hall can. I’m not wasting any time or money in removing it. Why should I? We only really have them up in the winter, so what’s the problem? Removing them will hit takings. We're still going to have tables and chairs outside so what difference does an awning make? It's just Podemos trying to make a name for themselves by making stupid noises. It's certainly not winning them any votes."

* The councillor responsible for the public way bylaw is Aurora Jhardi of Podemos.

Comments

The content of comment is the opinion of users and netizens and not of mallorcadailybulletin.com.

Comments contrary to laws, which are libellous, illegal or harmful to others are not permitted');

mallorcadailybulletin.com - reserves the right to remove any inappropriate comments.

Warning

Please remember that you are responsible for everything that you write and that data which are legally required can be made available to the relevant public authorities and courts; these data being name, email, IP of your computer as well as information accessible through the systems.

* Mandatory fields

palmadave / Hace 9 months

TC: It's certainly 'booming' for some residents with noise from illegal terraces.

+1-

TC / Hace 9 months

Just as Palma is booming, bang, there you go.

+4-

Adam Ostenfeld / Hace 9 months

This Obviously has not been very well thought out awnings actually can provide the apartments positioned over a Bar or restaurant with a reduction in street noise , intelligent Fair regulation of the terraces is FAR BETTER for these small Business people and Mallorca , this will certainly cause for more insecurity and lack of trust of Politicians and cause hardship to people who work very hard to make a living .

+12-

Paul / Hace 9 months

"One element that is currently absent from the new ordinance is any study of the economic impact of the changes" - just about says it all doesn't it

+22-