by Ray Fleming

Yesterday's Daily Telegraph front page was euphoric about the coalition government's revised proposals for planning and development reforms. They would be welcomed, said the paper, by everyone who wanted the British countryside protected from excessive or inappropriate industrial and housing development. The Telegraph mounted a strong campaign against the original proposals made last summer and it has every right to claim that it spoke for a great many people who thought the reforms misguided. But it was far from being alone and the pressure on the government for a rethink became irresistible when the phrase that there should be “a presumption in favour of sustainable development” was widely criticised. Questioned in an interview about what was meant by “sustainable development” David Cameron was unable to give a clear definition; yesterday's proposals still retain the phrase but qualify and define it in some detail.

Last year Chancellor George Osborne endorsed the government's proposals saying there were necessary to get rid of planning regulations that were “impeding growth and turning away investment.” Research showed, however, that 98 per cent of commercial planning applications were approved and 85 per cent of housing applications. Not for the first time complaints about red tape have been shown to be exaggerated. The revised regulations still need detailed study but the sense of relief at the government's second thoughts will be widespread.


The content of comment is the opinion of users and netizens and not of

Comments contrary to laws, which are libellous, illegal or harmful to others are not permitted'); - reserves the right to remove any inappropriate comments.


Please remember that you are responsible for everything that you write and that data which are legally required can be made available to the relevant public authorities and courts; these data being name, email, IP of your computer as well as information accessible through the systems.

* Mandatory fields

Currently there are no comments.